Francis Fukuyama’s Our Posthuman Future fears that biotechnology will make monsters of us. Steven Rose weighs the evidence. The power to genetically enhance future generations could be a boon for humanity – or it could lead to an era of violent rebellion against the. Is a baby whose personality has been chosen from a gene supermarket still a human? If we choose what we create what happens to morality? Is this the end of .

Author: Gujora Kemuro
Country: Guinea-Bissau
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Personal Growth
Published (Last): 13 February 2014
Pages: 446
PDF File Size: 13.15 Mb
ePub File Size: 10.86 Mb
ISBN: 852-3-97954-806-8
Downloads: 42704
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Yozshuzshura

Many embrace this power, under the banner of human freedom. Fukuyama defines human nature as “the sum of the behavior and characteristics that are typical of the human species, arising from genetics rather than environmental factors.

Naturalism would claim that there is an intrinsic universal human nature, and that therefore ethics, and as a consequence human “rights”, can be derived from it. Instead of Big Brother watching everyone, people could use the PC and Internet to watch Big Brother, as governments everywhere were driven to publish more information on their own activities.

Don’t mess with human nature…

Modern thinking is misguided about “human nature”, the only remedy being a return to pre-Kantian thinking about essences etc. People were again quick to point out that these two events–the collapse of totalitarian empires and the emergence of the personal computer, as well as other forms of inexpensive information technology, from TVs and radios to faxes and e-mail–were not unrelated.

The year came and went, with the United states psothuman locked in a Cold War struggle with the Soviet Union. Nothing imaginative here, just the usual fear mongering. Please try again later. Macmillan- Science – pages. Buy the selected items together This item: Fukuyama argues that the ability to manipulate the DNA of all of one person’s descendants will have profound, and potentially terrible, consequences for our political order, even if undertaken with the best of intentions.


Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Fukuyama posthumann the notion that biotechnology cannot be controlled. User Review – Flag as inappropriate I’m an undergraduate student witha a double major: As dispassionate and thoughtful as Fukuyama’s work appears on the surface, his call to action would have us expand the yoke of State control futur a time when his beloved model of Liberal Democracy is finally expanding across the globe, toppling barriers to the practical application possthuman human intelligence everywhere.

Set up a giveaway. Views Read Edit View history. Is this feature helpful? Page 1 of 1 Start over Page 1 of 1.

fujuyama Were a caveman to be plopped down in the late 20th Century and witness the first heart transplant, would he recoil in disgust and declare the practice inimical to the basic fabric of human existence?

So the major surprise of Fukuyama’s book is that, in the field of human biotechnology at least, he favours regulation. This is the only scenario in which it is plausible that we futue see a liberal democracy of the future get back into the business of state-sponsored eugenics.

For anyone seeking an ideal entry into the biotechnology debate, Fukuyama’s book is it. I don’t believe anyone would answer in the affirmative. These assumptions together constitute what has been called the naturalistic fallacy. There is no such thing as a biological family, fukjyama such thing as human nature or a “normal” human being, and even if there were, why should that be a guide for what is right and just? They feel themselves, in other words, to be lucky, and they are capable of feeling sympathy for people who are less lucky than themselves.

Review: Our Posthuman Future by Francis Fukuyama | Books | The Guardian

Those ends are not rigidly determined; human nature is very plastic, and we have an enormous range of choices conformable with that nature.


Some environmentalists see themselves as defending nature from human beings, and seem to be more concerned with threats to nonhuman than to human nature.

It is because he has belatedly realised fukiyama so long as scientific and technological innovation proceeds at its current breakneck pace, social stasis – the end of history – is impossible. If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?

English Choose a language for shopping. All of this could change with the impact of future biotechnology. It may be that we are fukuama destined to take up this new postthuman of freedom, or that the next stage of evolution is one in which, as some have suggested, we will deliberately take charge of our own biological makeup rather than leaving it to the blind forces of natural selection.

Most biotech is done in the US, and outside federal laboratories it is largely unregulated. Totalitarian rule depended on a regime”s ability tomaintain a monopoly over information, and once modern information technology made that impossible, the regime”s power was undermined. Indeed, this is one of the few things in a politics of the future that people are likely to rouse themselves to fight over.

Amazon Renewed Refurbished products with a warranty. Only slightly more soberly, psychopharmacologists offer the prospect of tailor-made drugs to ease the mental pain of living, enhance intelligence, and control disruptive behaviour. Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. Learn more about Amazon Prime.